May 15, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

WOW: St. Louis Rams Asking for $700 Million in Renovations to 17-Year-Old Dome

When it was built in 1995, St. Louis’ Edward Jones Dome was one of the biggest public financing projects in stadium history. The stadium cost $256 in bonds but by the time the debt on those is paid off, the public will have kicked in $720 million. The dome was designed to lure an NFL team back to St. Louis, which it did. But the most significant part of that effort was the lease that St. Louis signed with the Rams ownership. The lease requires the city to keep the stadium in the “top tier” of NFL stadiums or else the Rams can break their 30-year lease. What exactly constitutes “top tier” is the multimillion dollar question though.

The St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission on February 1 offered up a $124 million plan for a new stadium, windows and club seats. But that’s not near enough for the Rams. The team wants a retractable roof and the demolition of half the stadium for other purposes. They haven’t officially put a price tag on their requested renovations, but a construction company estimates it will be $700 million and would make the convention center largely useless for two years.

If the Rams are to stay in St. Louis, the team and the city will have to meet somewhere between $124 million and $700 million, but it may ultimately be up to an arbitrator to decide what renovations are necessary for a “top-tier” stadium. But rest assured, whatever those renovations are, they are sure to cost the public a lot more money…

(H/t FieldofSchemes.com)

May 11, 2012   |No Comments Blog, End the Sports Blackout Rule, Issues, Stadiums

MUST READ: Minnesota Vikings Get Their Stadium, But Fans Still Subjected to Blackout Rule

Yahoo Sports columnist Dan Wetzel is best known for being the America’s foremost critic of the BCS. But in his latest column, he tackles the NFL’s blackout rule, Minnesota’s new stadium for the Vikings, and how the two were (far too) briefly intertwined. And, as usual, he does so beautifully.

You can read the column here: Vikings get their new stadium, but fans are still subjected to ‘blackout’ rule

May 10, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, NFL, Stadiums

New Vikings Stadium Finally a Go — Time Will Tell at What Cost

The Minnesota Vikings have received their massive public subsidy for a new stadium. The Minnesota legislature passed stadium legislation and all that’s left is for Gov. Mark Dayton to sign the bill, which he will likely do. According to the AP:

The deal guarantees the Vikings’ future in Minnesota for three decades.

The team would pay 49 percent of construction costs: $477 million, which is $50 million more than owners initially committed. But the public expense is still high: $348 million for the state and $150 million for the city of Minneapolis.

But according to Field of Schemes author and stadium expert Neil deMause, Minneapolis’ share will end up being much higher:

The city of Minneapolis will put in $150 million in cash plus $189 million over 30 years for operating costs, a total that (counting the cost of borrowing the money, since the taxes to pay for it will be tied up paying off the convention center for the next few years) should come to around $375-525 million in present value.

Let’s just hope Minneapolis doesn’t have to start slashing social services when the debts begin to pile up, as Hamilton County (Cincinnati) has had to do to pay off their stadium debt

May 08, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Minnesota House Passes Vikings Stadium Bill But Ups Vikings Share by $105 Million

Yesterday, the Minnesota House passed legislation to fund a new stadium for the Vikings, but increased the share the Vikings would have to pay by $105 million. Of course, the Vikings and the NFL aren’t happy about the amendment increasing the Vikings share. Still, the stadium bill lives to fight another day and now a similar bill needs to pass the Minnesota Senate. And even if it does pass the Senate, there’s still the problematic matter of the city of Minneapolis’ $150 million contribution. That money would come from a redirected tax, but the Minneapolis citizens passed a referendum requiring a vote for any sports stadium funding more than $10 million. And the citizens there would likely vote against funding a new Vikings stadium. So there’s still a long way to go in this fight….

There are several reports on yesterday’s vote and where things stand, but here’s a good one from MinnPost.com.

May 07, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Viking Stadium Votes Set for Today

The long saga of the Minnesota Vikings quest for public financing of a new stadium could reach a climax today, with votes set in the Minneapolis House and Senate on stadium proposal. That proposal calls for the state to kick in $400 million and the city of Minneapolis to spend $150 million. The Vikings would pay $427 million.

Of course, many in the media are suggesting that if the stadium financing does fall through, this could be the last season for the Vikings in Minnesota. Which is ridiculous. Where are the Vikings going to go? There is no feasible alternative for them. Not in LA or anywhere else. It’s all smoke and mirrors designed to manipulate lawmakers into voting to spend public money on a new stadium.

We’ll keep you posted on today’s votes.

May 04, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Absolute MUST READ: How Sonics Owner’s Failed Quest for Luxury Seating Cost Seattle Its Team

The good folks at Deadspin have another must read post up today. A former employee of the late Seattle Supersonics explains how former owner Howard Schultz’s cheapness and demands for luxury seating cost Seattle its beloved franchise. The whole thing is a great read, but the following passage from Jeremy Repanich’s post is particularly important. It’s common knowledge to stadium scam observers that owners push for new stadiums primarily so they can sell new luxury seating. (See Atlanta Falcons’ owner Arthur Blank’s push to demolish a 20-year-old stadium.) But ownership always veils it as providing better facilities for the team so they can remain “competitive” and they claim it will improve the stadium experience for all fans. But Repanach reveals that — behind the curtain — new stadiums do nothing for the regular fan.

Wally Walker, the team’s president, gathered the minions in the bowels of the nondescript office park that housed the Sonics’ headquarters. Sure, it was coming a few days late, but at least we were finally getting some clarity and marching orders.

Alas, Walker didn’t have the good sense to lie to us. He went through a litany of minor reasons why the team needed a new arena: higher capacity, bigger arena footprint, more room for high-end concessions, more places for premium seat holders, a.k.a. the super rich, the people who could afford a pair of courtside season tickets for $70,000. These were the justifications he offered us to explain why we were asking for a heaping pile of taxpayer dollars. After Walker’s spiel, a member of the sales staff asked the fateful question: “Wally, what will this arena upgrade do for Joe Sixpack—the regular fan?”

Dead silence.

After an uncomfortable few seconds, Walker said, “Well, nothing.” The wind went out of me. It was as if he’d punched me in the stomach. Walker tried to backtrack, but the damage had been done. The battle for hearts and minds had ended before it’d even begun. I didn’t see how we’d get an arena deal led by men who couldn’t conceive of it as anything but a rich man’s boondoggle, perpetrated on behalf of other rich people. Average people would shoulder the costs of making sure that the Puget Sound’s affluent—suits at Boeing, executives at Microsoft—could be coddled at a sporting event that average people would no longer be able to afford to attend.

Repanach goes on to blame Howard Schultz more for the loss of the Sonics than Clay Bennett, who took the team to Oklahoma City and is commonly the villain in the story. If you’re interested in more on the Sonics tale, be sure to check out Sonicsgate.org. And h/t to FieldofSchemes.com for alerting us to the above passage.

May 03, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Vote on Minnesota Stadium Bill Scheduled for Monday

Stay tuned…

Here’s more on the latest developments: Vikings Stadium Plan Will Get Monday Vote

And if you need a refresher on what’s happened up until now, click here.

May 02, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

2012 MLB Fan Cost Index: $27/Average Ticket, $208 to Take Family of Four to Game

Team Marketing Report has released its annual Fan Cost Index for Major League Baseball. Not surprisingly, the Red Sox, Yankees and Cubs charge the most for tickets. Most expensive beer? That “honor” goes to the Miami Marlins, whose cheapest beer is $8. From the release:

The average ticket (which excludes premium categories) for the 2012 season is $26.98, 1 cent higher than last year’s survey. Sixteen teams raised prices.

In the previous two seasons, tickets to baseball games already had the slowest growth in the history of the 21-year history of the survey, with a 1.2 percent increase in 2011 and a 1.5 jump in 2010.

The Fan Cost Index, the total price to take a family of four to a game increased by 2.4 percent to $207.68, according to Team Marketing Report’s exclusive survey.

The Fan Cost Index is created by combining four non-premium tickets, two beers, four soft drinks, four hot dogs, parking, two programs and two adult-size hats.

As always, remember that the cost of attending baseball games is in addition to the public subsidization of these teams’ stadiums. In Miami, for instance, the public could end up paying $2.4 billion for the privilege of paying $242 to take a family of four to the game…

May 01, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Serious Political Football Being Played in Minnesota Over Stadium Subsidies

There’s a huge battle going on in Minnesota right now over whether or not to subsidize the Minnesota Vikings new stadium. If you’re a regular reader of SportsFans.org, you’re well aware of the history of this battle, but if not, click here for some old posts. In the latest developments, Minnesota Republicans are apparently pushing a roofless stadium plan (roof could be added on later) but Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton isn’t happy. It remains to be seen how this will turn out, but it will likely be resolved one way or another in the next few days, as legislators are trying to adjourn for the year to go home and campaign.  Click here for more.

Sports Fans Coalition continues to stress that 1) if the Vikings want a new stadium, they should pay for their own 2) there is no real threat of the team leaving Minnesota because there’s no alternative stadium in place anywhere else 3) the people of Minneapolis must have a public vote if they are expected to kick in $150 million and 4) if the state and Minneapolis voters do agree to use public money build a new stadium, there should be certain caveats like affordable seating and a ban on television blackouts.

April 29, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

MUST WATCH: “Sonicsgate” Documentary on CNBC Tonight at 10 PM ET

If you haven’t seen “Sonicsgate,” about how the storied 41-year Seattle Sonics franchise was stolen from that city, it’s a must watch. It airs at CNBC on 10 pm ET, so tune in or set your DVRs.

You can view the original movie on the Sonicsgate website, although the version airing tonight has been revised and includes new material. You can also learn more about the latest developments on the efforts to get basketball back to Seattle.

© 2010 National Sports Fan Coalition. All rights reserved. Download SFC Bylaws (PDF).

Save Next Season Petition Terms and Conditions
All information you provide on this petition signing form will be public on the petition signatures page, except your email address, which will remain private. You may receive updates on this issue and other issues from Sports Fans Coalition though you're always welcome to unsubscribe anytime. Your email is always safe with us.