May 08, 2012   |No Comments Blog, End the Sports Blackout Rule, Issues, NFL, Uncategorized

WOW! Minnesota Senate Passes Amendment Banning Blackouts in New Stadium!

The Minnesota Senate overwhelmingly passed an amendment to Vikings stadium legislation that would ban blackouts in the new stadium. We’re just learning of the news and will tell you more about it when know more but this is a big victory for Vikings fans. Sports Fans Coalition called for such an amendment two weeks ago today: Our Proposed Vikings Stadium Legislation Amendment: No Blackouts!

Tom Hauser, chief political reporter for KSTP-TV in St. Paul-Minneapolis just tweeted: “MN Senate just passed amendment preventing TV blackout of Vikings games. Senate president says 57 amendments remain!”

And Jim Ragsdale, Star Tribune Capitol reporter tweeted: “Blackout ban mania sweeps the Senate. Amendment wins 53-13″.

We hope the House passes a similar measure and the NFL is forced to eliminate blackouts or risk losing public financing for a new stadium. Not blacking out games for publicly financed stadiums is the least the NFL can do…especially considering they don’t work in the first place.

May 08, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Minnesota House Passes Vikings Stadium Bill But Ups Vikings Share by $105 Million

Yesterday, the Minnesota House passed legislation to fund a new stadium for the Vikings, but increased the share the Vikings would have to pay by $105 million. Of course, the Vikings and the NFL aren’t happy about the amendment increasing the Vikings share. Still, the stadium bill lives to fight another day and now a similar bill needs to pass the Minnesota Senate. And even if it does pass the Senate, there’s still the problematic matter of the city of Minneapolis’ $150 million contribution. That money would come from a redirected tax, but the Minneapolis citizens passed a referendum requiring a vote for any sports stadium funding more than $10 million. And the citizens there would likely vote against funding a new Vikings stadium. So there’s still a long way to go in this fight….

There are several reports on yesterday’s vote and where things stand, but here’s a good one from MinnPost.com.

May 07, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Viking Stadium Votes Set for Today

The long saga of the Minnesota Vikings quest for public financing of a new stadium could reach a climax today, with votes set in the Minneapolis House and Senate on stadium proposal. That proposal calls for the state to kick in $400 million and the city of Minneapolis to spend $150 million. The Vikings would pay $427 million.

Of course, many in the media are suggesting that if the stadium financing does fall through, this could be the last season for the Vikings in Minnesota. Which is ridiculous. Where are the Vikings going to go? There is no feasible alternative for them. Not in LA or anywhere else. It’s all smoke and mirrors designed to manipulate lawmakers into voting to spend public money on a new stadium.

We’ll keep you posted on today’s votes.

May 04, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Absolute MUST READ: How Sonics Owner’s Failed Quest for Luxury Seating Cost Seattle Its Team

The good folks at Deadspin have another must read post up today. A former employee of the late Seattle Supersonics explains how former owner Howard Schultz’s cheapness and demands for luxury seating cost Seattle its beloved franchise. The whole thing is a great read, but the following passage from Jeremy Repanich’s post is particularly important. It’s common knowledge to stadium scam observers that owners push for new stadiums primarily so they can sell new luxury seating. (See Atlanta Falcons’ owner Arthur Blank’s push to demolish a 20-year-old stadium.) But ownership always veils it as providing better facilities for the team so they can remain “competitive” and they claim it will improve the stadium experience for all fans. But Repanach reveals that — behind the curtain — new stadiums do nothing for the regular fan.

Wally Walker, the team’s president, gathered the minions in the bowels of the nondescript office park that housed the Sonics’ headquarters. Sure, it was coming a few days late, but at least we were finally getting some clarity and marching orders.

Alas, Walker didn’t have the good sense to lie to us. He went through a litany of minor reasons why the team needed a new arena: higher capacity, bigger arena footprint, more room for high-end concessions, more places for premium seat holders, a.k.a. the super rich, the people who could afford a pair of courtside season tickets for $70,000. These were the justifications he offered us to explain why we were asking for a heaping pile of taxpayer dollars. After Walker’s spiel, a member of the sales staff asked the fateful question: “Wally, what will this arena upgrade do for Joe Sixpack—the regular fan?”

Dead silence.

After an uncomfortable few seconds, Walker said, “Well, nothing.” The wind went out of me. It was as if he’d punched me in the stomach. Walker tried to backtrack, but the damage had been done. The battle for hearts and minds had ended before it’d even begun. I didn’t see how we’d get an arena deal led by men who couldn’t conceive of it as anything but a rich man’s boondoggle, perpetrated on behalf of other rich people. Average people would shoulder the costs of making sure that the Puget Sound’s affluent—suits at Boeing, executives at Microsoft—could be coddled at a sporting event that average people would no longer be able to afford to attend.

Repanach goes on to blame Howard Schultz more for the loss of the Sonics than Clay Bennett, who took the team to Oklahoma City and is commonly the villain in the story. If you’re interested in more on the Sonics tale, be sure to check out Sonicsgate.org. And h/t to FieldofSchemes.com for alerting us to the above passage.

May 03, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Vote on Minnesota Stadium Bill Scheduled for Monday

Stay tuned…

Here’s more on the latest developments: Vikings Stadium Plan Will Get Monday Vote

And if you need a refresher on what’s happened up until now, click here.

May 02, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

2012 MLB Fan Cost Index: $27/Average Ticket, $208 to Take Family of Four to Game

Team Marketing Report has released its annual Fan Cost Index for Major League Baseball. Not surprisingly, the Red Sox, Yankees and Cubs charge the most for tickets. Most expensive beer? That “honor” goes to the Miami Marlins, whose cheapest beer is $8. From the release:

The average ticket (which excludes premium categories) for the 2012 season is $26.98, 1 cent higher than last year’s survey. Sixteen teams raised prices.

In the previous two seasons, tickets to baseball games already had the slowest growth in the history of the 21-year history of the survey, with a 1.2 percent increase in 2011 and a 1.5 jump in 2010.

The Fan Cost Index, the total price to take a family of four to a game increased by 2.4 percent to $207.68, according to Team Marketing Report’s exclusive survey.

The Fan Cost Index is created by combining four non-premium tickets, two beers, four soft drinks, four hot dogs, parking, two programs and two adult-size hats.

As always, remember that the cost of attending baseball games is in addition to the public subsidization of these teams’ stadiums. In Miami, for instance, the public could end up paying $2.4 billion for the privilege of paying $242 to take a family of four to the game…

May 01, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Serious Political Football Being Played in Minnesota Over Stadium Subsidies

There’s a huge battle going on in Minnesota right now over whether or not to subsidize the Minnesota Vikings new stadium. If you’re a regular reader of SportsFans.org, you’re well aware of the history of this battle, but if not, click here for some old posts. In the latest developments, Minnesota Republicans are apparently pushing a roofless stadium plan (roof could be added on later) but Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton isn’t happy. It remains to be seen how this will turn out, but it will likely be resolved one way or another in the next few days, as legislators are trying to adjourn for the year to go home and campaign.  Click here for more.

Sports Fans Coalition continues to stress that 1) if the Vikings want a new stadium, they should pay for their own 2) there is no real threat of the team leaving Minnesota because there’s no alternative stadium in place anywhere else 3) the people of Minneapolis must have a public vote if they are expected to kick in $150 million and 4) if the state and Minneapolis voters do agree to use public money build a new stadium, there should be certain caveats like affordable seating and a ban on television blackouts.

May 01, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, NFL

NFL.com Asking Readers to “Compare” Players’ Wives, Girlfriends

Right now over at NFL.com, the league has a slideshow of players’ wives and girlfriends and is inviting readers to “compare” them. “See how Ryan Tannehill’s wife, Lauren, compares to other notable NFL wives and girlfriends,” the front page reads.

We agree with Houston Texans beat writer Stephanie Stradley (@StephStradley) that this is totally inappropriate for the league’s website. There seems little rationale for this slideshow — with its giant photos — other than to drive traffic to the website based on sexist imagery. The NFL then encourages readers to judge these women based on their looks.

In the last few years, the NFL has cultivated a sizable and passionate female fan base. It is disrespecting these fans by encouraging such boorish behavior. This sexist display is inappropriate and should be removed immediately.

From the front page of NFL.com:

An example of the slideshow:

April 30, 2012   |No Comments Blog, College Football Playoff, Issues

Now The BCS Wants to Hear From You…(On Twitter)

Along with the good guys at PlayoffPAC, we’ve previously asked what happened to the “grassroots conversations on the campus level” that the BCS promised would take place. There has been absolutely no evidence of any such “grassroots conversations” occurring on any campus. One only need to review the Twitter feed for the BCS (@EveryGameCounts) to see that not only were no conversations promoted, none even occurred on Twitter. So the options for a four-team playoff that the BCS is now recommending appear to be more of the same top-down governing of college football.

But fear not sports fans, now the BCS wants to hear from you. In two Twitter posts this morning, the BCS is asking for your opinion on how the four-team playoff should look. “We have presented the conferences a small number of options for a four-team playoff and we want to hear from you…What do you think? Should the semi-final games be on campus, or in bowl games, or at other neutral sites? What about champ game?”

It seems highly unlikely that there is still an “on campus” option given the statements of some members of college football’s cartel about the lack of infrastructure. So it’s really a matter of whether you prefer games take place via the bowls or at a neutral site. Don’t you wish they’d asked your opinion when BCS Executive Director Bill Hancock said “everything is on the table”?

So feel free to respond to the BCS if you want. We remain skeptical that they actually care what fans think. After all, they’ve made it this far (again) without input from fans, so why would they suddenly care now? And if they really did, shouldn’t they do more than rely on random Twitter responses?

April 29, 2012   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

MUST WATCH: “Sonicsgate” Documentary on CNBC Tonight at 10 PM ET

If you haven’t seen “Sonicsgate,” about how the storied 41-year Seattle Sonics franchise was stolen from that city, it’s a must watch. It airs at CNBC on 10 pm ET, so tune in or set your DVRs.

You can view the original movie on the Sonicsgate website, although the version airing tonight has been revised and includes new material. You can also learn more about the latest developments on the efforts to get basketball back to Seattle.

© 2010 National Sports Fan Coalition. All rights reserved. Download SFC Bylaws (PDF).

Save Next Season Petition Terms and Conditions
All information you provide on this petition signing form will be public on the petition signatures page, except your email address, which will remain private. You may receive updates on this issue and other issues from Sports Fans Coalition though you're always welcome to unsubscribe anytime. Your email is always safe with us.