April 06, 2010   |No Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

Baseball is BACK! Take Me Out….. A Second Mortgage

Baseball is BACK! Take Me Out…A Second Mortgage

by Jeremiah Tittle & Kelty Carpenter

While sentimental sentences that begin with ‘in my day’ are apt to lose many sports fan readers, there exists a fundamental flaw in what once was a rather accessible format to exert one’s fan-hood: going to the ballpark. The Major League Baseball season kicked off Sunday night with a rousing comeback win for the Red Sox over rivals and defending World Series Champions the New York Yankees, but who could afford to go to the game?

According to Duke University law professor Richard Schmalbeck and Rutgers business professor Jay Soled’s op-ed in the New York Times, the average price of Chicago Cubs tickets have increased 265% over the past 20 years (4 times the inflation rate) and that’s not accounting for parking, concessions, etc. Hence the second mortgage or home equity loan reference.

The sheer numbers are daunting, but their answer to the question ‘why?’ is far more disturbing.  Schmalbeck and Soled point out that ”a critical factor has been the ability of businesses to write off tickets as entertainment expenses — essentially a huge, and wholly unnecessary, government subsidy.”

The results of said subsidy are two-fold: more competition for rare seats and an increase in luxury boxes pitting family of four against Fortune 500 companies. The decrease of seats for the general public and increase of luxury box seats is a business decision by sports teams that is directly fueled by the law of the land. It directly diminishes sports fans’ purchasing power, and has been known to kick existing season ticket-holders out of the park.

The professors hit the point home and instantly earn the respect of the Sports Fans Coalition when imploring Congress to take action. “Ideally, Congress would get rid of business-entertainment deductions altogether — after all, they are little more than an excuse for corporate executives to consume luxury items at a discount, distorting markets and cheating the public out of substantial tax revenue.”

While the professors believe that eliminating tax breaks altogether would be too drastic a move suggesting that lawmakers find some middle ground, Elie Mystal takes a hardline approach in her Above the Law piece arguing that ”baseball owners are capable of running successful, money-making businesses without government welfare.”

It’s a powerful statement, and a testament to the fact the the SFC exists for this very reason. While teams and leagues push Congress around for more tax breaks, we can not stand idly by accepting status quo.

SportsFansCoalition.org Managing Editor Jeremiah Tittle and SFC Sports Business Reporter Kelty Carpenter contributed to this article.

[Kelty Carpenter is a graduate of Wake Forest University and soon-to-be graduate of Georgetown University's Sports Industry Management program. She currently serves as Sports Business reporter for SFC & Social Media Assistant for LinkStar PR. She loves Red Sox baseball and Deacon hoops.]

April 03, 2010   |No Comments Blog, College Football Playoff, Issues

NCAA Weighs Expansion on Eve of Final Four

NCAA Weighs Expansion on Eve of Final Four

by Jeremiah Tittle

The NCAA has been considering expanding the tournament beyond 65, and has only a couple of months to determine if opting out of its contract with CBS – making way for another 31 teams to join in on the Madness of March – is indeed a wise decision beyond the financials.

According to ESPN SportsCenter, the NCAA has “walked media through the proposal” to expand the brackets despite the pleas of many who feel the product would be diluted by stretching the 3 week tournament to fit an entire month on the calendar. The debate will continue as the NCAA takes the temperature of the media measuring the public response to the idea floating out there.

Meanwhile, the BCS headed up by Bill Hancock and Ari Fleischer(not that he could help Tiger Woods) look to use some of college basketball’s over pursuit of the almighty dollar (the tournament brings NCAA Basketball 92% of its revenue) as standing for their steadfast tactic of doing nothing. They reject the fans’ demands. They look to use fans’ against each other as a method for spinning the issue. Enough is enough. College football fans want a playoff.

SFC has proven that protecting the integrity of the college athlete is a sham. If that were so, why do the highest ranked college football teams schedule cupcakes mid-season? Why do they pad their schedule with lesser opponents claiming that additional contests at the end of the season could stretch undergrads too thin and would compromise academic endeavors. Talk about dilution! Gimme a break.

The bottom line is that those in power are the benefactors of  the system. The University Presidents want to stay put cashing million dollar paychecks each year ignoring the cries of fans as the system continues to work in their favor.

Andrea Adelson writes in the Orlando Sentinel that this behavior is pure ‘hypocrisy’ to be so closed minded about expansion in one sport in the name of the student athlete while pushing an extra 32 games onto another sport. The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, or put more accurately, the one hand that collects paychecks is still demanding more, more, more.

Jeremiah Tittle is Managing Editor of www.SportsFansCoalition.org.

April 02, 2010   |2 Comments Blog, Issues, Stadiums

SF Update: San Jose Wants A’s With No Strings Attached

San Francisco Update: San Jose Wants A’s With No Strings Attached

by Jeremiah Tittle

SFC recently reported on the Oakland A’s and San Francisco 49ers’ pursuit of new stadiums to house their clubs in the near future. What we’ve learned about bay area tax payers is that they are a force to be reckoned with.  They are informed and won’t allow sports teams to bully them into constructing a billion-dollar coliseum on the public dime. Good for them.

The latest news out of northern California is that San Jose County would be interested in donating land in their downtown area for a new A’s ballpark. While SFC loses respect for any kind of donation to billionaires, the local residents of San Jose have shown backbone in their demand that the team pay to build the stadium and for all operations going forward.

Like any team owner, Lew Wolff would love for someone else to pay for his big plans. Neil deMause of FieldofSchemes.com astutely points out that Wolff has yet to clarify how the city will handle traffic issues in downtown San Jose, Freemont, or Santa Clara (that is, if Major League Baseball allows the A’s to move onto cross-town rival Giants’ land).

Furthermore, our friends at NewBallpark.org have picked apart the San Jose State University poll – which found a majority of San Jose residents in favor of bringing the A’s to their downtown district - providing keen local insight into the struggles ahead for Commissioner Bud Selig and the owners in developing their plans to build in the bay area.

Note to San Francisco: Sports stadiums are not churches or government buildings and should be taxed ESPECIALLY if you provide the land free of charge to the club. SFC applauds your fight to keep billionaires out of your pockets in their pursuit of new toys.

Continue to follow developments in the San Fracisco saga here.

To start a Local Chapter in the bay area, email us here.

Jeremiah Tittle is the Managing Editor of SportsFansCoalition.org.

© 2010 National Sports Fan Coalition. All rights reserved. Download SFC Bylaws (PDF).

Save Next Season Petition Terms and Conditions
All information you provide on this petition signing form will be public on the petition signatures page, except your email address, which will remain private. You may receive updates on this issue and other issues from Sports Fans Coalition though you're always welcome to unsubscribe anytime. Your email is always safe with us.