While the SFC has accurately explained why securing a playoff for college football is the only way to restore the integrity of the NCAA, it has not been fully demonstrated how much fun all this would be for fans when all is said and done. Whether it’s a plus-1 scenario or a full-blown 64 team bracket replicating the Final Four in college hoops (suggested by Texas Tech head coach Mike Leach), we’re in for an exciting and, more importantly, satisfying winter ritual to determine who really is the best in the country.
By years end, there will be a handful of undefeated teams left, and despite the fact that one’s alma mater might win the Citi BCS National Championship Game, there will still be some remorse in the fact that it’s not a bona fide national championship. All doubt was not removed. The results are in and they leave us wanting more.
Some would argue that this is a good thing. In this case, ‘some’ refers to Ari Fleischer and the BCS. They are using dissatisfaction to market their sport. The debate, in their opinion, is more exciting than actually watching a great game between two teams who deserve to be on the field based on their performance in a previously held playoff contest in order to crown a true champ.
If you take a look at the lineup of BCS Bowls this year, you are seeing the matchups of conferences before the results are even in. What does that tell you? It is proof positive that the current system of predetermination is unfair and underwhelming.
The fact is that these BCS Bowl positions are promised to certain conferences long before the first kickoff of the season. We are left with a week of weak programming; a slew of lopsided victories just so contractual obligations are satisfied while the fans are left unsatisfied.
We won’t see the underdog triumph. The system is built in a way to reward affiliation and association over actual wins and losses on the field. The BCS benefits those teams in big conferences, and even the most respected coaches in those ‘elite’ conferences like Joe Paterno want this ‘bogus‘ system changed. Even though Texas is the heir apparent to this year’s BCS National Championship, their head coach Mack Brown has stated that there should not be a distinction between BCS and non-BCS schools and that all schools should be treated equally.
The penultimate example of how anticlimactic Division IA football has become at the hands of those administering the BCS is found this Saturday when the number 1 ranked Florida Gators face the number 2 ranked Alabama Crimson Tide for the SEC Championship in Atlanta, Georgia. Now, why would a game pitting number 1 vs. number 2 be disappointing? It’s because there will be no chance for either team to avenge the loss.
Think of all the possibilities. Sports Illustrated has already done so creating a mock 16-team playoff that would serve as a fitting format for a 4 week thrill ride filled with matchups based on merit and quality of play rather than the conference your University President bought its way into analogous to being a member of a country club.
Instead, the SEC Championship this Saturday represents what could have been. While it’s near impossible to find a ‘supporter of the BCS that isn’t paid by the BCS’ according to James Carville, we are surrounded by the pro-playoff contingent who won’t be satisfied until we see a National Championship decided on the field.
Until then, we just won’t be satisfied.